We know where your CEO works every day. This is the last polite warning.
An evidence-led legal AI workspace
From incident to legal response.
Finium Legal helps teams collect evidence, investigate the record and prepare legal work.
- SHA-256 at capture
- Qualified timestamp (QTSP)
- Custody event log
- Source link on every statement
- A lawyer decides
- Customer data stored and processed in the EU
Specimen matters · illustrative, not client material
Matters/M-0412CEO impersonation and threatMatters/M-0409Repeat listings using client markMatters/M-0398Supply agreement disputeDraft · awaiting lawyer reviewReview sheet · notices not sentIssues flagged · for counsel⌘K
M-0412 · illustrative specimen
CEO impersonation and threat
Draft · awaiting lawyer review
Intake · 6 received · 4 preserved from source, 2 client-suppliedI
POSTsocial.example/p/8h42xPROFILE@ceo.officeREPOSTsocial.example/p/9k1qSCREENSHOTscreenshot_0211.pngEMAILFW: is this us?PDFletter_0213.pdf
Hashed 6/6Ordered in matter timeBrief drafted
Chronology 8Exhibits 6People 2Brief
Matter time · basis labelledsha-256
02-11 18:22observedImpersonation profile createdE37b20…e9c4
02-12 09:14observedThreat post publishedE2a3f9…81b4
02-12 21:40observedRepost scatters contextE419dd…3a07
02-13 08:05observedComment adds workplace referenceE2a3f9…81b4
02-14 09:41reportedEarlier messages described by clientE55e0b…77f1
02-14 10:05custodyCaptured, hashed, assigned to exhibits
02-14 10:06custodyE2 classified as potential threat, for legal reviewE2
02-14 10:09custodyBrief drafted, queued for lawyer review
ExhibitE
E2social.example/p/8h42x
- Captured
- 2026-02-14 10:05:12 UTC
- SHA-256
- a3f9 2c1d 7e04 5b88 … 81b4
- Basis
- preserved from source
Custody log
10:05:12Captured from source
10:05:13SHA-256 recorded
10:05:15Assigned to exhibit E2
M-0409 · illustrative specimen
Repeat listings using client mark
Review sheet · notices not sent
Intake · 5 received · 4 listings preserved from source, 1 reference imageI
LISTINGmarketplace.example/i/30412LISTING…/i/30977LISTING…/i/31540LISTING…/i/31888IMAGEreference_mark.png
Hashed 5/5Grouped by seller and imageReview sheet drafted
Listings 4Matches 2Sellers 2Notices
First seen · match basis labelledsha-256
09-02 14:10observedL-1 listing shows client mark on productL14be0…11c2
09-16 08:41matchL-2 exact image match to L-1, same sellerL29e1c…0b6a
10-01 19:03observedL-3 uses the brand name, no image matchL3e07a…5d19
10-08 07:55matchL-4 perceptual image match, to reviewL431f8…c2e0
10-09 09:12custodyL-2 delisted, capture kept and marked no longer liveL2
10-09 09:20custodyReview sheet drafted for the IP team
10-09 09:24custodyDSA Art. 16 notice draft prepared, not sentL2
ExhibitE
L-2marketplace.example/i/30977
CLIENT
MARK
MARK
€ 39.90
Seller S-07 · same as L-1
- First seen
- 2026-09-16 08:41 UTC
- SHA-256
- 9e1c 44a0 d2f7 … 0b6a
- Match
- exact image match to L-1
- Source
- no longer live, capture kept
Notice draft · DSA Art. 16not sent
M-0398 · illustrative specimen
Supply agreement dispute
Issues flagged · for counsel
Intake · 5 document sets · 94 pages and messages, client-suppliedI
PDFsupply_agreement_2025.pdfEMLemail_thread.emlDOCXmeeting_notes_0310.docxZIPinvoice_set.zipPDFclaim_draft.pdf
Indexed 5/5Dated in matter timeGaps flagged
Chronology 7Issues 3Contradictions 1Draft
Matter time · each line cites its sourcecite
2025-03-01documentAgreement signed, delivery dates in cl. 4.1D1p.6
2025-09-10allegedClaim says notice of delay was givenD5¶ 12
2025-09-18documentSupplier first reports a tooling faultD2Email 9
2025-09-18conflictEarliest notice in the record is 8 days laterD2Email 9
2025-10-07documentLots 7 to 9 delivered lateD4Inv 0311
2025-10-12gapPrice adjustment: no supporting document
2025-10-14custodyChronology drafted, queued for counsel
Allegation vs recordC
Issue 2Notice of delay
AllegationClaim ¶ 12
Notice of the delay was given on 10 September.CONTRADICTION
RecordEmail 9 · 09-18
First mention of the tooling fault is on 18 September, eight days later.Open points for counsel
GapNo document supports the price adjustment
AskRequest call notes for 09-10 from the client
One workspace
Finium Legal combines monitoring, evidence collection and legal work in one workspace. From the first link to the draft your lawyer signs off.
01Available
Monitor & Collect
Identify relevant incidents and preserve the sources.
02AvailableInvestigate & Prepare
Build chronologies, link repeat authors and accounts, and classify legal risk for review.
03AvailableReview & Draft
Document review, research, tabular analysis and drafting in the Workbench.
Who it is for
Find the workflow for your team.
01
Media & personality-rights counsel
Prepare the evidence and chronology for your response without reconstructing everything by hand.
See the workflow 02Corporate legal, comms & crisis
Give your team and counsel the relevant sources, preserved evidence and incident timeline.
See the workflow 03Brand & IP teams
Turn recurring online infringements into evidence files your IP team can review.
See the workflow 04Disputes & investigations
Build a source-linked chronology and prepare the matter for legal review.
See the workflowExamples
Specimen matters · illustrativeThree kinds of matter. The same standard of record.
Whatever arrives, a post, a listing or a contract, ends up as an exhibit with a source, a time and a hash, or a citation to the page it came from.
Online incident · receivedscreenshot_0211.png · client-supplied
Prepared for reviewExhibit E2
E2social.example/p/8h42x
We know where your CEO works every day. This is the last polite warning.
- Captured
- 2026-02-14 10:05:12 UTC
- SHA-256
- a3f9 2c1d 7e04 5b88 … 81b4
- Basis
- preserved from source
- Source status
- live at capture
Custody log
10:05:12Captured from source
10:05:13SHA-256 recorded
10:05:15Assigned to exhibit E2
10:06:02Classified as potential threat, for legal review
AThe screenshot stays in the file as E1, labelled client-supplied.BThe source post is preserved as E2 and hashed at capture.CIf the post is deleted, E2 remains evidence, marked no longer live.
Brand & IP · listings to review sheetEarly access
Repeat listings become a review sheet.
First-seen dates, seller groups and image matches, ready for your IP team to decide each row.
Received
marketplace.example/i/30977
marketplace.example/i/31888
IP review sheet
L-2 · mark on productexact match L-1
L-4 · mark on productperceptual, to review
Disputes · documents to chronologyAvailable
Documents become a dated chronology.
Each entry cites the page or message it rests on, so counsel can check every date.
Received
supply_agreement_2025.pdf
email_thread.eml · 34 msgs
Chronology
09-10 notice claimedClaim ¶ 12
09-18 first notice foundEmail 9
Checkable, not claimed.
One published case study, and a verifier anyone can run.
Case study with method and limits
Anonymized figures from a read-only production audit. Classifications are candidates for lawyer review, not legal findings.
Read the case studyVerify an evidence pack without us.
Packs verify offline with the open-source evidence-verify tool. No Finium account needed.
See the verifierSecurity, stated precisely.
Every control with its status: available today, in progress or planned.
Review the controlsQuestions
What legal teams ask first.
Anything else, ask in the call.
Where is data stored?
Customer data is stored and processed in the EU. The public website is served via Cloudflare. Access is role-based and scoped per firm, sensitive matters route fail-closed to restricted storage, and client upload links expire. Data retention is set per contract. A customer DPA under Art. 28 GDPR is being finalised with counsel. Subprocessors and security documentation: see our Trust Center ↗.
Which sources do you cover?
Sources across the web: posts, pages, profiles and listings, including X, TikTok, Telegram and the open web, alongside screenshots and documents you upload. Legal risk classification is available for Germany; in other markets the evidence file works without classification.
How do we get an account?
Accounts are set up with your team after the demo; there is no self sign-up. Existing users log in at finiumlegal.com/login.
What does a trial include, and how is it priced?
Trial scope depends on the workflow. A paid pilot runs one workflow on 5 to 10 of your matters for 60 days at €1,500 to €3,000 and converts to an annual subscription. Full prices are on the pricing page.
Bring one real matter. We will run it end to end.
Start with your work email. You pick a time on the last step.