Build a source-linked chronology and prepare the matter for legal review.

Finium Legal reads contracts, email threads and notes into a dated chronology where every line cites the page or message it rests on. Document review, research and drafting happen in the Workbench.

Status today
  • Cited chronologyAvailable
  • Document index and evidence fileAvailable
  • Workbench review and draftingAvailable
  • Every line cites its source
  • Dated in matter time
  • SHA-256 on every file
  • Counsel decides
M-0398 · specimen matterillustrative, anonymized, not client material
Illustrative interface
Matters/M-0398Supply agreement disputeIssues flagged · for counsel⌘K

M-0398 · illustrative specimen

Supply agreement dispute

Issues flagged · for counsel

Intake · 5 document sets · 94 pages and messages, client-suppliedI
PDFsupply_agreement_2025.pdfEMLemail_thread.emlDOCXmeeting_notes_0310.docxZIPinvoice_set.zipPDFclaim_draft.pdf
Indexed 5/5Dated in matter timeGaps flagged
Chronology 7Issues 3Contradictions 1Draft
Matter time · each line cites its sourcecite
2025-03-01documentAgreement signed, delivery dates in cl. 4.1D1p.6
2025-09-10allegedClaim says notice of delay was givenD5¶ 12
2025-09-18documentSupplier first reports a tooling faultD2Email 9
2025-09-18conflictEarliest notice in the record is 8 days laterD2Email 9
2025-10-07documentLots 7 to 9 delivered lateD4Inv 0311
2025-10-12gapPrice adjustment: no supporting document
2025-10-14custodyChronology drafted, queued for counsel
Allegation vs recordC
Issue 2Notice of delay
AllegationClaim ¶ 12
Notice of the delay was given on 10 September.
CONTRADICTION
RecordEmail 9 · 09-18
First mention of the tooling fault is on 18 September, eight days later.
Open points for counsel
GapNo document supports the price adjustment
AskRequest call notes for 09-10 from the client
The problem

The record is in the documents. Finding it takes weeks.

01

Hundreds of pages.

Contracts, threads and notes arrive as one pile, in no particular order.

02

Dates drift.

Who said what, and when, gets retold rather than cited.

03

Context is lost.

Notes from calls and meetings sit apart from the documents they explain.

The disputes workflow.

The same three pillars as every Finium matter. Each task shows its real status.

01

Monitor & Collect

Available

Bring the document set into one matter, hashed at intake.

  • Read contracts, email threads, notes and invoices in the Workbench
    Available
  • Hash every file and open the custody log
    Available
  • Capture web pages the matter relies on, with a qualified timestamp
    Available
02

Investigate & Prepare

Available

Date every event and cite the page or message behind it.

  • Date events in matter time, each labelled by basis
    Available
  • Link every line to the page or message it rests on
    Available
  • Assemble exhibits with hashes
    Available
03

Review & Draft

Available

Counsel reviews, researches and drafts in the Workbench.

  • Workbench: document review, tabular analysis, research and drafting
    Available
  • Queue the chronology for counsel with reason codes
    Available
The cited chronology

Every line cites the page it rests on.

Each entry carries its date, its basis and a citation to the document, page or message. Counsel can check any line in one click.

M-0398 · Chronology · specimen7 entries · 94 pages and messages
Specimen chronology for matter M-0398
DateBasisEntryCitesAssessment
2025-03-01documentAgreement signed, delivery dates in cl. 4.1D1 p.6Counsel decides
2025-09-10allegedClaim says notice of delay was givenD5 ¶ 12Counsel decides
2025-09-18documentSupplier first reports a tooling faultD2 Email 9Counsel decides
2025-09-18conflictEarliest notice in the record is 8 days laterD2 Email 9Counsel decides
2025-10-07documentLots 7 to 9 delivered lateD4 Inv 0311Counsel decides
2025-10-12gapPrice adjustment: no supporting documentnoneCounsel decides
2025-10-14custodyChronology drafted, queued for counselCounsel decides

Specimen chronology. Conflict and gap lines mark where the record does not support a date, for counsel to review.

What counsel receives

A chronology you can check line by line.

  1. 01
    Cited chronology

    Dated entries, each citing the document, page or message it rests on.

  2. 02
    Document index

    Every file listed with its SHA-256 hash and custody events.

  3. 03
    Workbench drafts

    Review tables, research notes and drafts, with sources one click away.

  4. 04
    Verifiable export

    Root-hash manifest and custody log, checkable offline with evidence-verify.

Issue 2 · allegation vs record · specimen
Issue 2Notice of delay
AllegationClaim ¶ 12
Notice of the delay was given on 10 September.
CONTRADICTION
RecordEmail 9 · 09-18
First mention of the tooling fault is on 18 September, eight days later.
Open points for counsel
GapNo document supports the price adjustment
AskRequest call notes for 09-10 from the client

Illustrative, anonymized, not client material.

Limits

What we don't do.

Decisions

Finium does not assess the merits or give legal advice. Counsel does.

Sources

Chronology lines cite what is in the documents you provide. Finium does not fill gaps with assumptions.

Outcomes

No promised outcomes. Admissibility is decided by courts and counsel.

Access

Matters are scoped per organisation, with client, lawyer and operations roles.

Disputes · ways to start

Bring one document set.

Book a workflow demo, or start a document-set trial: one set of documents becomes a cited chronology for counsel.

  1. 01Document-set trial
  2. 02One matter's contracts, threads and notes
  3. 03Cited chronology and exhibits back to counsel
  4. 04Terms and pricing confirmed in the call
Questions

What legal teams ask first.

Anything else, ask in the call.

Does every line cite a source?
Yes. Each chronology line cites the document, page or message it rests on, so counsel can check it.
Does Finium find contradictions between a claim and the record?
The cited chronology and Workbench review let your team line claims up against the record, with every line pointing to its source. Counsel decides what a difference means.
Who decides what the documents mean?
Your team and counsel. Finium organises and cites the record. It does not assess the merits.
Can we work on the documents with AI?
Yes, in the Workbench: document review, tabular analysis, research and drafting, with sources one click away Available.
Will the chronology be admissible?
Admissibility is decided by courts and counsel. Finium keeps a hash and custody record for every file so the source of each line can be checked.

Bring one document set. We will build the chronology.

Start with your work email. You pick a time on the last step.

See pricingRequest an evidence sample

Step 1 of 330-minute walkthrough

Book a workflow demo

Next: the workflow and your role, then a time.

We use strictly necessary cookies and local storage (session, language preference, this consent record). With your consent we also use analytics cookies from Mixpanel and Google Analytics 4 to understand how the site and the product are used, and load the Cal.com scheduler on the demo page. Cookie Policy