Monitor, investigate, draft.

One workspace from the first link a client sends to the draft your lawyer signs off. Each capability shows its real status.

Book a workflow demo See a sample evidence file

Specimen matters · illustrative, not client material

Matters/M-0412CEO impersonation and threatMatters/M-0409Repeat listings using client markMatters/M-0398Supply agreement disputeDraft · awaiting lawyer reviewReview sheet · notices not sentIssues flagged · for counsel⌘K

M-0412 · illustrative specimen

CEO impersonation and threat

Draft · awaiting lawyer review

Intake · 6 received · 4 preserved from source, 2 client-suppliedI

POSTsocial.example/p/8h42xPROFILE@ceo.officeREPOSTsocial.example/p/9k1qSCREENSHOTscreenshot_0211.pngEMAILFW: is this us?PDFletter_0213.pdf

Hashed 6/6Ordered in matter timeBrief drafted

Chronology 8Exhibits 6People 2Brief

Matter time · basis labelledsha-256

02-11 18:22observedImpersonation profile createdE37b20…e9c4

02-12 09:14observedThreat post publishedE2a3f9…81b4

02-12 21:40observedRepost scatters contextE419dd…3a07

02-13 08:05observedComment adds workplace referenceE2a3f9…81b4

02-14 09:41reportedEarlier messages described by clientE55e0b…77f1

02-14 10:05custodyCaptured, hashed, assigned to exhibits

02-14 10:06custodyE2 classified as potential threat, for legal reviewE2

02-14 10:09custodyBrief drafted, queued for lawyer review

ExhibitE

E2social.example/p/8h42x

We know where your CEO ~~works every day~~. This is the last ~~polite~~ warning.

Captured: 2026-02-14 10:05:12 UTC
SHA-256: a3f9 2c1d 7e04 5b88 … 81b4
Basis: preserved from source

Custody log

10:05:12Captured from source

10:05:13SHA-256 recorded

10:05:15Assigned to exhibit E2

M-0409 · illustrative specimen

Repeat listings using client mark

Review sheet · notices not sent

Intake · 5 received · 4 listings preserved from source, 1 reference imageI

LISTINGmarketplace.example/i/30412LISTING…/i/30977LISTING…/i/31540LISTING…/i/31888IMAGEreference_mark.png

Hashed 5/5Grouped by seller and imageReview sheet drafted

Listings 4Matches 2Sellers 2Notices

First seen · match basis labelledsha-256

09-02 14:10observedL-1 listing shows client mark on productL14be0…11c2

09-16 08:41matchL-2 exact image match to L-1, same sellerL29e1c…0b6a

10-01 19:03observedL-3 uses the brand name, no image matchL3e07a…5d19

10-08 07:55matchL-4 perceptual image match, to reviewL431f8…c2e0

10-09 09:12custodyL-2 delisted, capture kept and marked no longer liveL2

10-09 09:20custodyReview sheet drafted for the IP team

10-09 09:24custodyDSA Art. 16 notice draft prepared, not sentL2

ExhibitE

L-2marketplace.example/i/30977

CLIENT
MARK

€ 39.90

Seller S-07 · same as L-1

First seen: 2026-09-16 08:41 UTC
SHA-256: 9e1c 44a0 d2f7 … 0b6a
Match: exact image match to L-1
Source: no longer live, capture kept

Notice draft · DSA Art. 16not sent

M-0398 · illustrative specimen

Supply agreement dispute

Issues flagged · for counsel

Intake · 5 document sets · 94 pages and messages, client-suppliedI

PDFsupply_agreement_2025.pdfEMLemail_thread.emlDOCXmeeting_notes_0310.docxZIPinvoice_set.zipPDFclaim_draft.pdf

Indexed 5/5Dated in matter timeGaps flagged

Chronology 7Issues 3Contradictions 1Draft

Matter time · each line cites its sourcecite

2025-03-01documentAgreement signed, delivery dates in cl. 4.1D1p.6

2025-09-10allegedClaim says notice of delay was givenD5¶ 12

2025-09-18documentSupplier first reports a tooling faultD2Email 9

2025-09-18conflictEarliest notice in the record is 8 days laterD2Email 9

2025-10-07documentLots 7 to 9 delivered lateD4Inv 0311

2025-10-12gapPrice adjustment: no supporting document

2025-10-14custodyChronology drafted, queued for counsel

Allegation vs recordC

Issue 2Notice of delay

AllegationClaim ¶ 12

Notice of the delay was given on 10 September.

CONTRADICTION

RecordEmail 9 · 09-18

First mention of the tooling fault is on 18 September, eight days later.

Open points for counsel

GapNo document supports the price adjustment

AskRequest call notes for 09-10 from the client

Three pillars, one matter.

From the first link a client sends to the draft a lawyer signs off. Each task shows its real status, so you know what you get today.

Monitor & Collect

0 of 8 available

Identify relevant incidents and preserve the sources before they change.

Capture posts, pages, profiles and listings with metadataAvailable

Hash at capture and open the custody logAvailable

Qualified timestamp from a QTSP (qualified trust service provider) on each captureAvailable

Capture the SSL/TLS certificate data of each page to support authenticityAvailable

Monitor sources across the web, run with our operations teamAvailable

Automatic, scheduled monitoring runsAvailable

Discovery across the web, including X, TikTok, Telegram and the open webAvailable

Keep historical captures as evidence after the source is deletedAvailable

Investigate & Prepare

0 of 5 available

Build chronologies, link what repeats and classify legal risk for review.

Order events in matter time, each labelled by basisAvailable

Assemble the evidence file with exhibits and hashesAvailable

Group repeat authors across a matterAvailable

Link accounts behind coordinated attacks, seller networks and impersonation infrastructureAvailable

Classify legal risk for lawyer review, by jurisdictionAvailable

Legal risk classification by jurisdiction
Germany	Available
United Kingdom	In progress
Austria	In progress
Switzerland	In progress
Spain	In progress
United States	In progress

Match repeat brand listings by image and sellerEarly access

Review & Draft

0 of 3 available

Lawyers review, research and draft, with sources one click away.

Queue the file for lawyer review with reason codesAvailable

Link every statement to its sourceAvailable

Draft notices: DSA Art. 16, DMCA, de-indexing. Documents only, never sent by FiniumEarly access

Workbench: document review, research, tabular analysis and draftingAvailable

See all three pillars on one of your matters. We run it end to end in the call.

Book a workflow demo

Three kinds of matter. The same standard of record.

Whatever arrives, a post, a listing or a contract, ends up as an exhibit with a source, a time and a hash, or a citation to the page it came from.

Specimen matters · illustrative

Online incident · receivedscreenshot_0211.png · client-supplied

Prepared for reviewExhibit E2

E2social.example/p/8h42x

We know where your CEO ~~works every day~~. This is the last ~~polite~~ warning.

Captured: 2026-02-14 10:05:12 UTC
SHA-256: a3f9 2c1d 7e04 5b88 … 81b4
Basis: preserved from source
Source status: live at capture

Custody log

10:05:12Captured from source

10:05:13SHA-256 recorded

10:05:15Assigned to exhibit E2

10:06:02Classified as potential threat, for legal review

AThe screenshot stays in the file as E1, labelled client-supplied.BThe source post is preserved as E2 and hashed at capture.CIf the post is deleted, E2 remains evidence, marked no longer live.

Brand & IP · listings to review sheetEarly access

Repeat listings become a review sheet.

First-seen dates, seller groups and image matches, ready for your IP team to decide each row.

Received

marketplace.example/i/30977

marketplace.example/i/31888

IP review sheet

L-2 · mark on productexact match L-1

L-4 · mark on productperceptual, to review

See the brand & IP workflow

Disputes · documents to chronologyAvailable

Documents become a dated chronology.

Each entry cites the page or message it rests on, so counsel can check every date.

Received

supply_agreement_2025.pdf

email_thread.eml · 34 msgs

Chronology

09-10 notice claimedClaim ¶ 12

09-18 first notice foundEmail 9

Bring a document set to the demo

What legal teams ask first.

Anything else, ask in the call.

Which sources do you cover?

Sources across the web: posts, pages, profiles and listings, including X, TikTok, Telegram and the open web, alongside screenshots and documents you upload. Legal risk classification is available for Germany; in other markets the evidence file works without classification.

Who does the monitoring?

Monitoring runs across the web on a schedule agreed for each matter, set up and run with our operations team. Captures are hashed and qualified-timestamped as they are taken.

Does Finium send notices or takedowns?

No. Notice drafts (DSA Art. 16, DMCA, de-indexing) are documents for your team. Your lawyers decide what is sent, to whom and when.

Will the evidence be admissible?

Finium preserves and documents: SHA-256 at capture, a qualified timestamp from a QTSP, the page's SSL/TLS certificate data, a custody event log, a root-hash manifest at export and an open-source offline verifier. Admissibility is decided by courts and counsel, and we make no promise about it.

Bring one real matter. We will run it end to end.

Start with your work email. You pick a time on the last step.

See pricing Request an evidence sample